multi-reviewer-patterns

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with deduplication and severity calibration. Patterns for coordinating parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions, deduplicating findings, calibrating severity, and producing consolidated reports. When multiple reviewers report issues at the same location: - Allocates reviews across five dimensions (Security, Performance, Architecture, Testing, Accessibility) with recommended combinations for different code change types - Deduplicates findings from multiple reviewers using merge rules based on file location and issue type, with conflict resolution for severity ratings - Provides severity calibration criteria (Critical, High, Medium, Low) tied to impact, likelihood, and domain-specific examples - Includes a consolidated report template that aggregates findings by severity and dimension with summary statistics and prioritized recommendations - Organizing a multi-dimensional code review - Deciding which review dimensions to assign - Deduplicating findings from multiple reviewers - Calibrating severity ratings consistently - Producing a consolidated review report - Same file:line, same issue — Merge into one finding, credit all reviewers - Same file:line, different issues — Keep as separate findings - Same issue, different locations — Keep separate but cross-reference - Conflicting severity — Use the...